On Fri, Oct 02, 2020 at 03:56:28PM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote: > Am Freitag, 2. Oktober 2020, 15:15:55 CEST schrieb Willy Tarreau: > > Hi Willy, > > > > And this is all ??? > > > > Possibly a lot of people got used to seeing the numerous versions > > and are less attentive to new series, it's possible that your message > > will wake everyone up. > > I think that points to my patch series. My patch series which provide a > complete separate, API and ABI compliant drop in replacement of /dev/random, > nobody from the gatekeepers cared to even answer. It would not touch the > existing code. > > After waiting some time without changing the code (e.g. after Andi Lutomirski > commented), I got no answer at all from the gatekeepers, not even any > indication in what direction I should move if something was not desired in the > patch series. > > Thus I continued adding the features that I think are necessary and for which > I received comments from mathematicians. What else should I do? > > With the patch set v35 of my patch series, I see all my goals finally > achieved at I expect the code to be stable from here on. The last one was the > hardest: to get rid of all non-cryptographic conditioning operations and yet > retain performance en par or even superior to the existing /dev/random > implementation. Would you mind to resend it here, for a comparison? Torsten
