Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: crypto: add new compatible for V3s

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 05, 2020 at 05:51:48PM +0200, Martin Cerveny wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 2 Sep 2020, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 01:40:15PM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 12:57:19PM +0200, Corentin Labbe wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Sep 01, 2020 at 11:32:49AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 31, 2020 at 09:30:59AM +0200, Martin Cerveny wrote:
> > > > > > Like A33 "sun4i-ss" has a difference, it give SHA1 digest
> > > > > > directly in BE. So add new compatible.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Tested-by: Martin Cerveny <m.cerveny@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > 
> > > > > The Tested-by tag is for the other developpers. You're very much
> > > > > expected to have tested your patch before contributing it.
> > > > > 
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Martin Cerveny <m.cerveny@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >  .../bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml          | 5 ++++-
> > > > > >  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > > > index fc823572b..180efd13a 100644
> > > > > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto.yaml
> > > > > > @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ properties:
> > > > > >            - const: allwinner,sun4i-a10-crypto
> > > > > >        - items:
> > > > > >            - const: allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
> > > > > > +      - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
> > > > > 
> > > > > If it's compatible with the A33, why do we need to introduce a new compatible?
> > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > >    reg:
> > > > > >      maxItems: 1
> > > > > > @@ -59,7 +60,9 @@ if:
> > > > > >    properties:
> > > > > >      compatible:
> > > > > >        contains:
> > > > > > -        const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
> > > > > > +        oneOf:
> > > > > > +          - const: allwinner,sun6i-a31-crypto
> > > > > > +          - const: allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto
> > > > > 
> > > > > I guess the A33 compatible should be on that list as well?
> > > > 
> > > > This is the list of "need reset".
> > > > So we cannot use allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto
> > > > Probably this explanation should be in the commit message.
> > > 
> > > But the A33 has a reset in the DTSI
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> > Oh right so I need to send a fix for that and Martin Cerveny could simply use the "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto" (and so keep only patch #1(DTS))
> > 
> > Regards
> > 
> 
> What is "right" solution for DTSI ?
> - compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto";
> OR
> - compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto", "allwinner,sun8i-a33-crypto";
> (but unimplemented "allwinner,sun8i-v3s-crypto")

Generally, this one in case you have differences like bugs or features.

Rob



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux