Re: lib/crypto/chacha.c:65:1: warning: the frame size of 1604 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 27 Aug 2020 at 11:20, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 10:42 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > In that case, I suppose we should simply disable instrumentation for
> > chacha_permute()? It is a straight-forward arithmetic transformation
> > on a u32[16] array, where ubsan has limited value afaict.
>
> I guess that always works as a last resort, but shouldn't we first try
> to figure out why ubsan even makes a difference and whether the
> object code without ubsan looks like a reasonable representation
> of the source form?
>
> Since it really is a fairly simple transformation, I would have
> expected the compiler to not emit any ubsan checks. If gcc
> only gets confused about the fixed offsets possibly overflowing
> the fixed-length array, maybe it helps to give it a little extra
> information like (untested):
>
> --- a/lib/crypto/chacha.c
> +++ b/lib/crypto/chacha.c
> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>  #include <asm/unaligned.h>
>  #include <crypto/chacha.h>
>
> -static void chacha_permute(u32 *x, int nrounds)
> +static void chacha_permute(u32 x[16], int nrounds)
>  {
>         int i;
>

That does not help, unfortunately.

What does seem to work is

struct chacha_state { u32 x[16]; };

struct chacha_state chacha_permute(struct chacha_state st, int nrounds)
{
  struct chacha_state ret = st;
  u32 *x = ret.x;

  ...

  return st;
}

(and updating the caller accordingly, obviously)



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux