Re: [PATCH] uacce: unmap remaining mmapping from user space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Zhangfei,


On 2020/2/24 15:06, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
When uacce parent device module is removed, user app may
still keep the mmaped area, which can be accessed unsafely.
When rmmod, Parent device drvier will call uacce_remove,
which unmap all remaining mapping from user space for safety.
VM_FAULT_SIGBUS is also reported to user space accordingly.

Suggested-by: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
  drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c | 17 +++++++++++++++++
  include/linux/uacce.h      |  2 ++
  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
index ffced4d..1bcc5e6 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/uacce/uacce.c
@@ -224,6 +224,7 @@ static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
init_waitqueue_head(&q->wait);
  	filep->private_data = q;
+	uacce->inode = inode;
  	q->state = UACCE_Q_INIT;
return 0;
@@ -253,6 +254,14 @@ static int uacce_fops_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
  	return 0;
  }
+static vm_fault_t uacce_vma_fault(struct vm_fault *vmf)
+{
+	if (vmf->flags & (FAULT_FLAG_MKWRITE | FAULT_FLAG_WRITE))
+		return VM_FAULT_SIGBUS;
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
  static void uacce_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  {
  	struct uacce_queue *q = vma->vm_private_data;
@@ -265,6 +274,7 @@ static void uacce_vma_close(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
  }
static const struct vm_operations_struct uacce_vm_ops = {
+	.fault = uacce_vma_fault,
  	.close = uacce_vma_close,
  };
@@ -585,6 +595,13 @@ void uacce_remove(struct uacce_device *uacce)
  		cdev_device_del(uacce->cdev, &uacce->dev);
  	xa_erase(&uacce_xa, uacce->dev_id);
  	put_device(&uacce->dev);
+
+	/*
+	 * unmap remainning mapping from user space, preventing user still
+	 * access the mmaped area while parent device is already removed
+	 */
+	if (uacce->inode)
+		unmap_mapping_range(uacce->inode->i_mapping, 0, 0, 1);
Should we unmap them at the first of 'uacce_remove', and before 'uacce_put_queue'?

Thanks,
Zaibo

.
  }
  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uacce_remove);
diff --git a/include/linux/uacce.h b/include/linux/uacce.h
index 904a461..0e215e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/uacce.h
+++ b/include/linux/uacce.h
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ struct uacce_queue {
   * @priv: private pointer of the uacce
   * @mm_list: list head of uacce_mm->list
   * @mm_lock: lock for mm_list
+ * @inode: core vfs
   */
  struct uacce_device {
  	const char *algs;
@@ -113,6 +114,7 @@ struct uacce_device {
  	void *priv;
  	struct list_head mm_list;
  	struct mutex mm_lock;
+	struct inode *inode;
  };
/**





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux