On Tue, 2020-02-11 at 16:49 -0500, Mimi Zohar wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-02-10 at 20:44 +0800, Tianjia Zhang wrote:
> > The name sm3-256 is defined in hash_algo_name in hash_info, but the
> > algorithm name implemented in sm3_generic.c is sm3, which will cause
> > the sm3-256 algorithm to be not found in some application scenarios of
> > the hash algorithm, and an ENOENT error will occur. For example,
> > IMA, keys, and other subsystems that reference hash_algo_name all use
> > the hash algorithm of sm3.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tianjia Zhang <tianjia.zhang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> The "hash_map" needs to be updated to reflect this change.
>
> static struct tpm2_hash tpm2_hash_map[] = {
> {HASH_ALGO_SHA1, TPM_ALG_SHA1},
> {HASH_ALGO_SHA256, TPM_ALG_SHA256},
> {HASH_ALGO_SHA384, TPM_ALG_SHA384},
> {HASH_ALGO_SHA512, TPM_ALG_SHA512},
> {HASH_ALGO_SM3_256, TPM_ALG_SM3_256},
> };
Never mind, the enum name "HASH_ALGO_SM3_256" didn't change. Just the
string changed.
Mimi
