Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits
From: Horia Geanta <horia.geanta@xxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 18:00:38 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@xxxxxxx>, Andrey Smirnov <andrew.smirnov@xxxxxxxxx>, Alison Wang <alison.wang@xxxxxxx>
References: <1574634784-10571-1-git-send-email-iuliana.prodan@nxp.com> <VI1PR0402MB34857C5B83AC9811BB87F419984A0@VI1PR0402MB3485.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com> <VI1PR04MB44455C61E2D64EFF88CE39768C4A0@VI1PR04MB4445.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>

On 11/25/2019 2:02 PM, Iuliana Prodan wrote:
> So, what's your suggestion? We shouldn't reset the MCFGR[PS] at all? We 
> should use the value set by u-boot?
> Yes.

Horia

References:
- [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits
  - From: Iuliana Prodan
- Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits
  - From: Horia Geanta
- Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits
  - From: Iuliana Prodan

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH v4 1/6] crypto: caam - RNG4 TRNG errata
Next by Date: INFO: rcu detected stall in sys_open (2)
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] crypto: caam - do not reset pointer size if caam_ptr_size is 64 bits
Next by thread: INFO: rcu detected stall in sys_open (2)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel] [Gnu Classpath] [Gnu Crypto] [DM Crypt] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux