On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 03:34:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:12:40AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote: > > I thought about that. The main problem is that most of the > > construct/append functions use the header, and these are the functions > > most useful to the TPM2B operation. > > > > The other thing that argues against this is that the TPM2B case would > > save nothing if we eliminated the header, because we allocate a page > > for all the data regardless. > > It would be way more clean. There is absolutely nothing TPM2B specific. Given the recent regression I'm detaching allocation from tpm_buf and make it purely a decorator (sending patch today). /Jarkko
