Re: [PATCH v6 02/12] tpm-buf: add handling for TPM2B types

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Sep 25, 2019 at 03:34:01PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 07:12:40AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > I thought about that.  The main problem is that most of the
> > construct/append functions use the header, and these are the functions
> > most useful to the TPM2B operation.
> > 
> > The other thing that argues against this is that the TPM2B case would
> > save nothing if we eliminated the header, because we allocate a page
> > for all the data regardless.
> 
> It would be way more clean. There is absolutely nothing TPM2B specific.

Given the recent regression I'm detaching allocation from tpm_buf and
make it purely a decorator (sending patch today).

/Jarkko



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux