On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 07:21, Harald Freudenberger <freude@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 22.08.19 12:24, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > Fix a typo XTS_BLOCKSIZE -> XTS_BLOCK_SIZE, causing the build to > > break. > > > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Apologies for the sloppiness. > > > > Herbert, could we please merge this before cryptodev hits -next? > > > > arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c | 4 ++-- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c > > index a34faadc757e..d4f6fd42a105 100644 > > --- a/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c > > +++ b/arch/s390/crypto/aes_s390.c > > @@ -586,7 +586,7 @@ static int xts_aes_encrypt(struct blkcipher_desc *desc, > > struct s390_xts_ctx *xts_ctx = crypto_blkcipher_ctx(desc->tfm); > > struct blkcipher_walk walk; > > > > - if (unlikely(!xts_ctx->fc || (nbytes % XTS_BLOCKSIZE) != 0)) > > + if (unlikely(!xts_ctx->fc || (nbytes % XTS_BLOCK_SIZE) != 0)) > > return xts_fallback_encrypt(desc, dst, src, nbytes); > > > > blkcipher_walk_init(&walk, dst, src, nbytes); > > @@ -600,7 +600,7 @@ static int xts_aes_decrypt(struct blkcipher_desc *desc, > > struct s390_xts_ctx *xts_ctx = crypto_blkcipher_ctx(desc->tfm); > > struct blkcipher_walk walk; > > > > - if (unlikely(!xts_ctx->fc || (nbytes % XTS_BLOCKSIZE) != 0)) > > + if (unlikely(!xts_ctx->fc || (nbytes % XTS_BLOCK_SIZE) != 0)) > > return xts_fallback_decrypt(desc, dst, src, nbytes); > > > > blkcipher_walk_init(&walk, dst, src, nbytes); > > Applied together with the aes xts common code fix and the testmanager fixes, > build and tested. Works fine, Thanks. > With the 'extra run-time crypto self tests' enabled I see a failure of the s390 xts > implementation when nbytes=0 is used (should return with EINVAL but actually > returns with 0). I'll send a fix for this via the s390 maintainers. Thanks Harald.
