Herbert, > -----Original Message----- > From: linux-crypto-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <linux-crypto-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> On Behalf Of Herbert Xu > Sent: Friday, July 26, 2019 2:03 PM > To: Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Cc: linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; antoine.tenart@xxxxxxxxxxx; davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/3] crypto: inside-secure - broaden driver scope > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 11:33:07AM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Just a gentle ping to remind people that this patch set - which incorporates the feedback I > > got on an earlier version thereof - has been pending for over a month now without > > receiving any feedback on it whatsoever ... > > Your patches are not in patchwork. If they're not there then > they won't be applied. You need to find out why your emails > weren't accepted by the mailing list or patchwork.kernel.org. > Actually, I did receive them back through the mailing list. In fact I depend on the mailing list to get them into my own regular company mailbox as I have to send them through gmail from my Linux dev system ... So I'm 100% confident they got sent out correctly. I don't really know why they did not end up in patchwork? Is there anything wrong with the formatting of the patches? If so, please let me know so I can fix that prior to resending them(!) ... > Cheers, > -- > Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ > PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt Regards, Pascal van Leeuwen Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Verimatrix www.insidesecure.com
