On 6/17/19 1:09 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > Using a bare block cipher in non-crypto code is almost always a bad idea, > not only for security reasons (and we've seen some examples of this in > the kernel in the past), but also for performance reasons. > > In the TCP fastopen case, we call into the bare AES block cipher one or > two times (depending on whether the connection is IPv4 or IPv6). On most > systems, this results in a call chain such as > > crypto_cipher_encrypt_one(ctx, dst, src) > crypto_cipher_crt(tfm)->cit_encrypt_one(crypto_cipher_tfm(tfm), ...); > aesni_encrypt > kernel_fpu_begin(); > aesni_enc(ctx, dst, src); // asm routine > kernel_fpu_end(); > > It is highly unlikely that the use of special AES instructions has a > benefit in this case, especially since we are doing the above twice > for IPv6 connections, instead of using a transform which can process > the entire input in one go. > > We could switch to the cbcmac(aes) shash, which would at least get > rid of the duplicated overhead in *some* cases (i.e., today, only > arm64 has an accelerated implementation of cbcmac(aes), while x86 will > end up using the generic cbcmac template wrapping the AES-NI cipher, > which basically ends up doing exactly the above). However, in the given > context, it makes more sense to use a light-weight MAC algorithm that > is more suitable for the purpose at hand, such as SipHash. > > Since the output size of SipHash already matches our chosen value for > TCP_FASTOPEN_COOKIE_SIZE, and given that it accepts arbitrary input > sizes, this greatly simplifies the code as well. > > NOTE: Server farms backing a single server IP for load balancing purposes > and sharing a single fastopen key will be adversely affected by > this change unless all systems in the pool receive their kernel > upgrades at the same time. > > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- All our fastopen packetdrill tests pass (after I changed all the cookie values in them) Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@xxxxxxxxxx>
