Re: [PATCH] lib80211: use crypto API ccm(aes) transform for CCMP processing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 16 Jun 2019 at 21:01, Eric Biggers <ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi Ard,
>
> On Fri, Jun 14, 2019 at 11:29:22AM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> > -static void ccmp_init_blocks(struct crypto_cipher *tfm,
> > -                          struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > -                          u8 * pn, size_t dlen, u8 * b0, u8 * auth, u8 * s0)
> > +static void ccmp_init_blocks(struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr,
> > +                          u8 * pn, size_t dlen, u8 * b0, u8 * aad)
> >  {
> >       u8 *pos, qc = 0;
> >       size_t aad_len;
> >       int a4_included, qc_included;
> > -     u8 aad[2 * AES_BLOCK_LEN];
> >
> >       a4_included = ieee80211_has_a4(hdr->frame_control);
> >       qc_included = ieee80211_is_data_qos(hdr->frame_control);
> > @@ -131,17 +123,19 @@ static void ccmp_init_blocks(struct crypto_cipher *tfm,
> >               aad_len += 2;
> >       }
> >
> > -     /* CCM Initial Block:
> > -      * Flag (Include authentication header, M=3 (8-octet MIC),
> > -      *       L=1 (2-octet Dlen))
> > -      * Nonce: 0x00 | A2 | PN
> > -      * Dlen */
> > -     b0[0] = 0x59;
> > +     /* In CCM, the initial vectors (IV) used for CTR mode encryption and CBC
> > +      * mode authentication are not allowed to collide, yet both are derived
> > +      * from this vector b0. We only set L := 1 here to indicate that the
> > +      * data size can be represented in (L+1) bytes. The CCM layer will take
> > +      * care of storing the data length in the top (L+1) bytes and setting
> > +      * and clearing the other bits as is required to derive the two IVs.
> > +      */
> > +     b0[0] = 0x1;
> > +
> > +     /* Nonce: QC | A2 | PN */
> >       b0[1] = qc;
> >       memcpy(b0 + 2, hdr->addr2, ETH_ALEN);
> >       memcpy(b0 + 8, pn, CCMP_PN_LEN);
> > -     b0[14] = (dlen >> 8) & 0xff;
> > -     b0[15] = dlen & 0xff;
> >
> >       /* AAD:
> >        * FC with bits 4..6 and 11..13 masked to zero; 14 is always one
> > @@ -166,16 +160,6 @@ static void ccmp_init_blocks(struct crypto_cipher *tfm,
> >               aad[a4_included ? 30 : 24] = qc;
> >               /* rest of QC masked */
> >       }
> > -
> > -     /* Start with the first block and AAD */
> > -     lib80211_ccmp_aes_encrypt(tfm, b0, auth);
> > -     xor_block(auth, aad, AES_BLOCK_LEN);
> > -     lib80211_ccmp_aes_encrypt(tfm, auth, auth);
> > -     xor_block(auth, &aad[AES_BLOCK_LEN], AES_BLOCK_LEN);
> > -     lib80211_ccmp_aes_encrypt(tfm, auth, auth);
> > -     b0[0] &= 0x07;
> > -     b0[14] = b0[15] = 0;
> > -     lib80211_ccmp_aes_encrypt(tfm, b0, s0);
> >  }
>
> How about shifting the contents of aad over by 2 bytes and returning the AAD
> length from this function instead?  It's confusing to still manually format the
> AAD length for CCM mode, when actually it's ignored now.
>
> Also I suggest fixing up the naming:
>
>         ccmp_init_blocks() => ccmp_init_iv_and_aad()
>         b0 => iv
>
> >
> >  static int lib80211_ccmp_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len,
> > @@ -218,13 +202,13 @@ static int lib80211_ccmp_hdr(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len,
> >  static int lib80211_ccmp_encrypt(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len, void *priv)
> >  {
> >       struct lib80211_ccmp_data *key = priv;
> > -     int data_len, i, blocks, last, len;
> > -     u8 *pos, *mic;
> >       struct ieee80211_hdr *hdr;
> > -     u8 *b0 = key->tx_b0;
> > -     u8 *b = key->tx_b;
> > -     u8 *e = key->tx_e;
> > -     u8 *s0 = key->tx_s0;
> > +     struct aead_request *req;
> > +     struct scatterlist sg[2];
> > +     u8 *aad = key->tx_aad;
> > +     u8 b0[AES_BLOCK_LEN];
> > +     int len, data_len;
> > +     int ret;
> >
> >       if (skb_tailroom(skb) < CCMP_MIC_LEN || skb->len < hdr_len)
> >               return -1;
> > @@ -234,31 +218,29 @@ static int lib80211_ccmp_encrypt(struct sk_buff *skb, int hdr_len, void *priv)
> >       if (len < 0)
> >               return -1;
> >
> > -     pos = skb->data + hdr_len + CCMP_HDR_LEN;
> > +     req = kzalloc(sizeof(*req) + crypto_aead_reqsize(key->tfm), GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +     if (!req)
> > +             return -ENOMEM;
> > +
>
> Why not kzalloc() and kzfree() instead of aead_request_alloc() and
> aead_request_free()?  Same in lib80211_ccmp_decrypt().
>

Why kzalloc, right? (i.e., without the 'not'). Good question, I'll change that.

> Otherwise this patch looks good, though I'd like for someone to test it.
>
> Thanks for doing this!
>

As you know, I want to get rid of all the crypto cobbled together
using the cipher interface. I guess it's my turn to clean up some of
this mess :-)



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux