On 6/13/2019 3:32 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>
>
> Le 13/06/2019 à 14:24, Horia Geanta a écrit :
>> On 6/13/2019 3:16 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Le 13/06/2019 à 14:13, Horia Geanta a écrit :
>>>> On 6/11/2019 5:39 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>>>>> Next patch will require struct talitos_edesc to be defined
>>>>> earlier in talitos.c
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch moves it into talitos.h so that it can be used
>>>>> from any place in talitos.c
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 37b5e8897eb5 ("crypto: talitos - chain in buffered data for ahash on SEC1")
>>>>> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@xxxxxx>
>>>> Again, this patch does not qualify as a fix.
>>>>
>>>
>>> But as I said, the following one is a fix and require that one, you told
>>> me to add stable in Cc: to make it explicit it was to go into stable.
>> Yes, but you should remove the Fixes tag.
>> And probably replace "Next patch" with the commit headline.
>>
>>> If someone tries to merge following one into stable with taking that one
>>> first, build will fail.
>> This shouldn't happen, order from main tree should be preserved.
>>
>
> When they pick up fixes, AFAIK they don't take all the preceeding commits.
>
This is not about Fixes tag, but Cc tag:
https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/stable-kernel-rules.html#option-1
Horia
