RE: another testmgr question

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Biggers [mailto:ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Thursday, May 23, 2019 8:59 PM
> To: Pascal Van Leeuwen <pvanleeuwen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: linux-crypto-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: another testmgr question
>
> On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 01:07:25PM +0000, Pascal Van Leeuwen wrote:
> > Eric,
> >
> > I'm running into some trouble with some random vectors that do *zero*
> > length operations. Now you can go all formal about how the API does
> > not explictly disallow this, but how much sense does it really make
> > to essentially encrypt, hash or authenticate absolutely *nothing*?
> >
> > It makes so little sense that we never bothered to support it in any
> > of our hardware developed over the past two decades ... and no
> > customer has ever complained about this, to the best of my knowledge.
> >
> > Can't you just remove those zero length tests?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Pascal van Leeuwen
> > Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Inside Secure
> > www.insidesecure.com
>
> Please send this to linux-crypto (not linux-crypto-owner) so this can be
> discussed on the list.
>

Oops ... looks like I've been copy-pasting the wrong e-mail list address.
Mea culpa. Now forwarded to the correct list.

Regards,

Pascal van Leeuwen
Silicon IP Architect, Multi-Protocol Engines @ Inside Secure
www.insidesecure.com






[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux