Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel
From: David Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 12:04:35 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Jason@xxxxxxxxx, linux-crypto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, netdev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, ebiggers@xxxxxxxxxx, ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx, samuel.c.p.neves@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20190325115156.wj4verbfdd2rspo5@gondor.apana.org.au>
References: <20190322071122.6677-1-Jason@zx2c4.com> <20190325115156.wj4verbfdd2rspo5@gondor.apana.org.au>

From: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2019 19:51:56 +0800

> I really think we ought to separate the zinc interface from these
> new crypto implementations.  They have nothing to do with each
> other.

I completely agree.

References:
- [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel
  - From: Jason A. Donenfeld
- Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel
  - From: Herbert Xu

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel
Next by Date: Bad file pattern in MAINTAINERS section 'IBM Power in-Nest Crypto Acceleration'
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH net-next v9 00/19] WireGuard: Secure Network Tunnel
Next by thread: [PATCH] crypto: caam - fix copy of next buffer for xcbc and cmac
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel] [Gnu Classpath] [Gnu Crypto] [DM Crypt] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq]

Powered by Linux