On Mon, Mar 25, 2019 at 11:43 AM Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > onto a synchronous interface. My concern is that we will end up with > Zinc patches 12 months from now that implement async interfaces to > support some particular piece of hardware, while other hardware is > only supported by the crypto/ API, even though the algorithm they > implement is the same. Allow me to allay that concern: Zinc is for simple synchronous software functions.
