Am Samstag, 12. Januar 2019, 06:27:59 CET schrieb Eric Biggers: Hi Eric, [...] > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_CRYPTO_KDF) += kdf.o > > This naming is too generic. CONFIG_CRYPTO_KDF and kdf.c imply that this is > related to all KDFs. But actually it is an implementation of a few specific > KDFs. Can you give it a clearer name, like KDF_SP800? > I am going to use kdf_sp800108 or CRYPTO_CONFIG_KDF_SP800108. The reason is that there are many SP800 documents. Thanks Ciao Stephan
