On (11/30/18 10:45), Dave Rodgman wrote:
> Looking a bit more closely, these structs are formatted fairly
> inconsistently in the crypto directory. So, lzo-rle is consistent with
> what lzo does... but various other files do it differently.
>
> I'm happy to submit a whitespace cleanup patch if people would like, and
> get everything in that directory consistent (i.e. adopt a style similar
> to the example below)?
I'm not in any position to ask you to do this; white-space clean ups
are not very popular (it's OK for staging tree; not so much otherwise).
So we better ask David and Herbert.
> static struct scomp_alg scomp = {
> .alloc_ctx = lzorle_alloc_ctx,
> .free_ctx = lzorle_free_ctx,
> .compress = lzorle_scompress,
> .decompress = lzorle_sdecompress,
> .base = {
> .cra_name = "lzo-rle",
> .cra_driver_name = "lzo-rle-scomp",
> .cra_module = THIS_MODULE,
> }
> };
Looks nice.
-ss
