On 21 October 2018 at 10:07, James Bottomley
<James.Bottomley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 2018-10-21 at 09:05 +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> (+ James)
>
> Thanks!
>
>> On 20 October 2018 at 01:01, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov
>> <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > crypto_cfb_decrypt_segment() incorrectly XOR'ed generated keystream
>> > with
>> > IV, rather than with data stream, resulting in incorrect
>> > decryption.
>> > Test vectors will be added in the next patch.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> > ---
>> > crypto/cfb.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/crypto/cfb.c b/crypto/cfb.c
>> > index a0d68c09e1b9..fd4e8500e121 100644
>> > --- a/crypto/cfb.c
>> > +++ b/crypto/cfb.c
>> > @@ -144,7 +144,7 @@ static int crypto_cfb_decrypt_segment(struct
>> > skcipher_walk *walk,
>> >
>> > do {
>> > crypto_cfb_encrypt_one(tfm, iv, dst);
>> > - crypto_xor(dst, iv, bsize);
>> > + crypto_xor(dst, src, bsize);
>
> This does look right. I think the reason the TPM code works is that it
> always does encrypt/decrypt in-place, which is a separate piece of the
> code which appears to be correct.
>
Yeah I figured that.
So where is the TPM code that actually uses this code?
