On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 09:44:02PM +0200, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On 10/9/18 12:20 AM, Kees Cook wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 12:17 PM, Gustavo A. R. Silva
> > <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> The original intention is to allocate space for EIP197_DEFAULT_RING_SIZE
> >> *pointers* to struct, so sizeof(priv->ring[i].rdr_req) should be
> >> sizeof(*priv->ring[i].rdr_req).
> >>
> >> Addresses-Coverity-ID: 1473962 ("Sizeof not portable")
> >> Fixes: 9744fec95f06 ("crypto: inside-secure - remove request list to improve performance")
> >> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
>
>
> Friendly ping. Who can take this?
Well I tried to take it but it doesn't apply against cryptodev.
So I presume this can go into the tree that carried the change
which it depended on?
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
