On 28 September 2018 at 17:49, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 25 September 2018 at 16:56, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> These NEON and non-NEON implementations come from Andy Polyakov's >> implementation, and are included here in raw form without modification, >> so that subsequent commits that fix these up for the kernel can see how >> it has changed. This awkward commit splitting has been requested for the >> ARM[64] implementations in particular. >> >> While this is CRYPTOGAMS code, the originating code for this happens to >> be the same as OpenSSL's commit 87cc649f30aaf69b351701875b9dac07c29ce8a2 >> >> Signed-off-by: Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> >> Based-on-code-from: Andy Polyakov <appro@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Samuel Neves <sneves@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Jean-Philippe Aumasson <jeanphilippe.aumasson@xxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Andy Polyakov <appro@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: Russell King <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > As I mentioned before, I'd prefer this to be based on the original .pl > but if I am the only one objecting to this, I guess I can live with > it. > Note that I am getting bounces from LAKML because the patch is too big.
