On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:23 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > RFC follow-up to https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CAGXu5j+bpLK=EQ9LHkO8V=sdaQwt==6fbGhgn2Vi1E9_WxSGRQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > The core API changes: > > struct crypto_sync_skcipher > crypto_alloc_sync_skcipher() > crypto_free_sync_skcipher() > crypto_sync_skcipher_setkey() > skcipher_request_set_sync_tfm() > SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK type check > > and a single user's refactoring as an example: > > drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-crypto.h > drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-crypto-aes-xts.c > > Does this look correct? If so, I can continue and do the other 60 > instances of SKCIPHER_REQUEST_ON_STACK(). Herbert, how does this look? Should I do the other 60 instances? I'd really like to get this finished up. :) Thanks! -Kees -- Kees Cook Pixel Security
