> On Sep 11, 2018, at 3:18 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld <Jason@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 4:16 PM Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Jason, can you do one of these conversions as an example? > > My preference is really to leave that to a different patch series. But > if you think I *must*, then I shall. > > I think Ard’s point is valid: in the long run we don’t want two competing software implementations of each primitive. It clearly *should* be possible to make crypto API call into zinc for synchronous software operations, but a demonstration of how this actually works and that there isn’t some change to zinc to make it would well would be in order, I think. IMO the right approach is do one conversion right away and save the rest for later.
