On Tue, Sep 04, 2018 at 11:18:55AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 08:43:35PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > On 28 August 2018 at 19:01, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 01:02:43PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > >> Add a CRC32 feature bit and wire it up to the CPU id register so we > > >> will be able to use alternatives patching for CRC32 operations. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > > >> --- > > >> arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h | 3 ++- > > >> arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 9 +++++++++ > > >> 2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> > > > > > > With the minor caveat below... > > > > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > >> index ae1f70450fb2..9932aca9704b 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpucaps.h > > >> @@ -51,7 +51,8 @@ > > >> #define ARM64_SSBD 30 > > >> #define ARM64_MISMATCHED_CACHE_TYPE 31 > > >> #define ARM64_HAS_STAGE2_FWB 32 > > >> +#define ARM64_HAS_CRC32 33 > > >> > > >> -#define ARM64_NCAPS 33 > > >> +#define ARM64_NCAPS 34 > > > > > > > > > ... if this goes via crypto, you'll almost certainly get a (trivial) > > > conflict with arm64, since these numbers get bumped all the time. > > > > > > > I think the first three patches should go through the arm64 tree. The > > last one just removes the now redundant crc32 SIMD driver, and Herbert > > could pick that up separately, i.e., it should be totally independent. > > Yes let's do that. Okey doke! In which case, please can we have your Ack on the first patch? Cheers, Will
