On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 06:12:21PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > As reported by Vakul, checking the TIF_NEED_RESCHED flag after every > iteration of the GHASH and AES-GCM core routines is having a considerable > performance impact on cores such as the Cortex-A53 with Crypto Extensions > implemented. > > GHASH performance is down by 22% for large block sizes, and AES-GCM is > down by 16% for large block sizes and 128 bit keys. This appears to be > a result of the high performance of the crypto instructions on the one > hand (2.0 cycles per byte for GHASH, 3.0 cpb for AES-GCM), combined with > the relatively poor load/store performance of this simple core. > > So let's reduce this performance impact by only doing the yield check > once every 32 blocks for GHASH (or 4 when using the version based on > 8-bit polynomial multiplication), and once every 16 blocks for AES-GCM. > This way, we recover most of the performance while still limiting the > duration of scheduling blackouts due to disabling preemption to ~1000 > cycles. > > Cc: Vakul Garg <vakul.garg@xxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-core.S | 12 +++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-core.S b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-core.S > index dcffb9e77589..9c14beaabeee 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-core.S > +++ b/arch/arm64/crypto/ghash-ce-core.S > @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ > ushr XL.2d, XL.2d, #1 > .endm > > - .macro __pmull_ghash, pn > + .macro __pmull_ghash, pn, yield_count > frame_push 5 > > mov x19, x0 > @@ -259,6 +259,9 @@ CPU_LE( rev64 T1.16b, T1.16b ) > eor T2.16b, T2.16b, XH.16b > eor XL.16b, XL.16b, T2.16b > > + tst w19, #(\yield_count - 1) This should perhaps be (\yield_count) - 1. It would be a bit silly to pass a non-trivial expression for yield_count though. > + b.ne 1b > + Is it worth having a build-time check that \yield_count is a power of two? (i.e., (\yield_count) & ((\yield_count) - 1) != 0). We could have a generic macro for that. Otherwise this code may poll more often than expected. Not the end of the world, though. [...] Cheers ---Dave