Re: [PATCH 2/2] crypto: DRBG - use caller buffer if suitable

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>> On Fri, Jul 20, 2018 at 07:09:05AM +0200, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>> 
>> Maybe I have a different understanding of how such interface should look like.
>> 
>> Can you give me some more detail on how you envision such virtual address interface should work?
> 
> It should look like shash.
> 

Ok, but then:

- should it be synchronous like blkcipher?

- the TFMs (cipher Impls and templates) all operate on SGLs - should a virt API simply convert a virt address into an SGL? If so, the problem that triggered this thread is still not solved but only pushed to a different layer. If it should not just be an SGL wrapper, should all TFMs be changed?

Thanks





[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux