Re: [PATCH v3 1/6] tpm-buf: create new functions for handling TPM buffers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 2018-03-10 at 14:14 -0800, James Bottomley wrote:
>  	TPM_BUF_OVERFLOW	= BIT(0),
> +	TPM_BUF_2B		= BIT(1),

Instead of re-using this I would prefer to have another enum for
buffer type. tpm_buf_init() could have the signature:

int tpm_buf_init(unsigned int type);

For commands there should be a function:

void tpm_buf_set_command_header(struct tpm_buf *buf, u16 tag, u32 ordinal);

And tpm_buf_append_2b() should not exist at all. It should be
maintained automatically by other append commands.

/Jarkko



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux