On 7 December 2017 at 14:11, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@xxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 06, 2017 at 07:43:36PM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> We are going to add code to all the NEON crypto routines that will >> turn them into non-leaf functions, so we need to manage the stack >> frames. To make this less tedious and error prone, add some macros >> that take the number of callee saved registers to preserve and the >> extra size to allocate in the stack frame (for locals) and emit >> the ldp/stp sequences. >> >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@xxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 60 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h >> index aef72d886677..5f61487e9f93 100644 >> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h >> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/assembler.h >> @@ -499,6 +499,66 @@ alternative_else_nop_endif >> #endif >> .endm >> >> + /* >> + * frame_push - Push @regcount callee saved registers to the stack, >> + * starting at x19, as well as x29/x30, and set x29 to >> + * the new value of sp. Add @extra bytes of stack space >> + * for locals. >> + */ >> + .macro frame_push, regcount:req, extra >> + __frame st, \regcount, \extra >> + .endm >> + >> + /* >> + * frame_pop - Pop @regcount callee saved registers from the stack, >> + * starting at x19, as well as x29/x30. Also pop @extra >> + * bytes of stack space for locals. >> + */ >> + .macro frame_pop, regcount:req, extra >> + __frame ld, \regcount, \extra >> + .endm >> + >> + .macro __frame, op, regcount:req, extra=0 >> + .ifc \op, st >> + stp x29, x30, [sp, #-((\regcount + 3) / 2) * 16 - \extra]! >> + mov x29, sp >> + .endif >> + .if \regcount < 0 || \regcount > 10 >> + .error "regcount should be in the range [0 ... 10]" >> + .endif >> + .if (\extra % 16) != 0 >> + .error "extra should be a multiple of 16 bytes" >> + .endif >> + .if \regcount > 1 >> + \op\()p x19, x20, [sp, #16] >> + .if \regcount > 3 >> + \op\()p x21, x22, [sp, #32] >> + .if \regcount > 5 >> + \op\()p x23, x24, [sp, #48] >> + .if \regcount > 7 >> + \op\()p x25, x26, [sp, #64] >> + .if \regcount > 9 >> + \op\()p x27, x28, [sp, #80] > > Can the _for thing I introduced in fpsimdmacros.h be any use here? > Alternatively, the following could replace that .if-slide, > providing the calling macro does .altmacro .. .noaltmacro somewhere. > > .macro _pushpop2 op, n1, n2, offset > \op x\n1, x\n2, [sp, #\offset] > .endm > > .macro _pushpop op, first, last, offset > .if \first < \last > _pushpop2 \op\()p, \first, %\first + 1, \offset > _pushpop \op, %\first + 2, \last, %\offset + 16 > .elseif \first == \last > \op\()r x\first, [sp, #\offset] > .endif > .endm > I'd prefer not to rely on altmacro, for reasons you pointed out yourself a while ago IIRC. I agree your version is more compact, but for a write once thing, I'm not sure if it matters. > Also, I wonder whether it would be more readable at the call site > to specify the first and last reg numbers instead of the reg count, > e.g.: > > frame_push first_reg=19, last_reg=23 > > (or whatever). Just syntactic sugar though. > Again, this will involve arithmetic on macro arguments, which implies altmacro. Relying on altmacro being set is dodgy, and unfortunately, we can't enable it in the macro without keeping it enabled (or we may disable it on behalf of the caller. I guess we could try to come up with a smart way to infer whether altmacro was enabled, and only disable it afterwards if it wasn't, using some directives that get interpreted differently, but to be honest, I factored out this sequence so I could think about more important things :-)
