Hi Herbert, On 01.12.2017 11:36, Herbert Xu wrote: > On Fri, Dec 01, 2017 at 11:18:30AM +0100, Kamil Konieczny wrote: >> >> Herbert, is it possible for every init/update that areq->result can be NULL, >> and only for final/update/digit user set it to actual memory ? >> testmgr.c can check if hash update writes into areq->result and if yes, >> then test fails ? > > Yes we should modify testmgr to check that. I can write patch for it. Should it WARN_ON or treat it as error ? -- Best regards, Kamil Konieczny Samsung R&D Institute Poland