Hello Vladimir,
>>[snip]
>> -static struct s5p_aes_dev *s5p_dev;
>> +enum hash_op {
>> + HASH_OP_UPDATE = 1,
>> + HASH_OP_FINAL = 2
>> +};
>
> If this type is not going to be extended, then I'd rather suggest to
> use a boolean correspondent field in the struct s5p_hash_reqctx instead
> of a new introduced type. [...]
In prevoious mail I wrote 'op_final', but this will actually be 'op_update'.
--
Best regards,
Kamil Konieczny
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
