Re: [PATCH V2] Fix a sleep-in-atomic bug in shash_setkey_unaligned

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Oct 2, 2017, at 7:25 PM, Jia-Ju Bai <baijiaju1990@xxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The SCTP program may sleep under a spinlock, and the function call path is:
> sctp_generate_t3_rtx_event (acquire the spinlock)
>  sctp_do_sm
>    sctp_side_effects
>      sctp_cmd_interpreter
>        sctp_make_init_ack
>          sctp_pack_cookie
>            crypto_shash_setkey
>              shash_setkey_unaligned
>                kmalloc(GFP_KERNEL)
>

I'm going to go out on a limb here: why on Earth is out crypto API so
full of indirection that we allocate memory at all here?

We're synchronously computing a hash of a small amount of data using
either HMAC-SHA1 or HMAC-SHA256 (determined at runtime) if I read it
right.  There's a sane way to do this that doesn't need kmalloc,
alloca, or fancy indirection.  And then there's crypto_shash_xyz().

--Andy, who is sick of seeing stupid bugs caused by the fact that it's
basically impossible to use the crypto API in a sane way.

P.S. gnulib has:

int hmac_sha256 (const void *key, size_t keylen, const void *in,
size_t inlen, void *resbuf);

An init/update/final-style API would be nice, but something like this
would be a phenomenal improvement over what we have.



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux