On 04/08/17 07:03 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote: > I haven't really followed the discussion on this, but if the tilcdc's > use of iowrite64 causes (real) problems/complications elsewhere, I think > we could drop it. Well, that's up to you. The patch I submitted should still be correct though, and if arm ever gets a proper atomic iowrite64 implementation it would be good to use it. So in an annotative sense it's nice to keep the function call in there. Thanks, Logan
