On 03/29/2017 08:13 AM, Michal Suchánek wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:51:35 +0200
> Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 02:56:39PM +0200, Michal Suchanek wrote:
>>> While reviewing commit 11c6e16ee13a ("crypto: vmx - Adding asm
>>> subroutines for XTS") which adds the OpenSSL license header to
>>> drivers/crypto/vmx/aesp8-ppc.pl licensing of this driver came into
>>> qestion. The whole license reads:
>>>
>>> # Licensed under the OpenSSL license (the "License"). You may not
>>> use # this file except in compliance with the License. You can
>>> obtain a # copy
>>> # in the file LICENSE in the source distribution or at
>>> # https://www.openssl.org/source/license.html
>>>
>>> #
>>> #
>>> ====================================================================
>>> # Written by Andy Polyakov <appro@xxxxxxxxxxx> for the OpenSSL #
>>> project. The module is, however, dual licensed under OpenSSL and #
>>> CRYPTOGAMS licenses depending on where you obtain it. For further #
>>> details see http://www.openssl.org/~appro/cryptogams/. #
>>> ====================================================================
>>>
>>> After seeking legal advice it is still not clear that this driver
>>> can be legally used in Linux. In particular the "depending on where
>>> you obtain it" part does not make it clear when you can apply the
>>> GPL and when the OpenSSL license.
>>>
>>> I tried contacting the author of the code for clarification but did
>>> not hear back. In absence of clear licensing the only solution I
>>> see is removing this code.
A quick 'git grep OpenSSL' of the Linux tree returns several other
crypto files under the ARM architecture that are similarly licensed. Namely:
arch/arm/crypto/sha1-armv4-large.S
arch/arm/crypto/sha256-armv4.pl
arch/arm/crypto/sha256-core.S_shipped
arch/arm/crypto/sha512-armv4.pl
arch/arm/crypto/sha512-core.S_shipped
arch/arm64/crypto/sha256-core.S_shipped
arch/arm64/crypto/sha512-armv8.pl
arch/arm64/crypto/sha512-core.S_shipped
On closer inspection of some of those files have the addendum that
"Permission to use under GPL terms is granted", but not all of them.
-Tyrel
