On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:46:44PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> Am Freitag, 24. März 2017, 15:43:48 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>
> Hi Krzysztof,
>
> > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 03:37:59PM +0100, Stephan Müller wrote:
> > > Am Freitag, 24. März 2017, 15:24:44 CET schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
> > >
> > > Hi Krzysztof,
> > >
> > > > +
> > > > +static int exynos_rng_set_seed(struct exynos_rng_dev *rng,
> > > > + const u8 *seed, unsigned int slen)
> > > > +{
> > > > + int ret, i;
> > > > + u32 val;
> > > > +
> > > > + dev_dbg(rng->dev, "Seeding with %u bytes\n", slen);
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = clk_prepare_enable(rng->clk);
> > > > + if (ret)
> > > > + return ret;
> > > > +
> > > > + if (slen < EXYNOS_RNG_SEED_SIZE) {
> > > > + dev_warn(rng->dev, "Seed too short (only %u bytes)\n", slen);
> > > > + ret = -EINVAL;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + for (i = 0 ; i < EXYNOS_RNG_SEED_REGS ; i++) {
> > > > + val = seed[i * 4] << 24;
> > > > + val |= seed[i * 4 + 1] << 16;
> > > > + val |= seed[i * 4 + 2] << 8;
> > > > + val |= seed[i * 4 + 3] << 0;
> > > > +
> > > > + exynos_rng_writel(rng, val, EXYNOS_RNG_SEED(i));
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + val = exynos_rng_readl(rng, EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS);
> > > > + if (!(val & EXYNOS_RNG_STATUS_SEED_SETTING_DONE)) {
> > > > + dev_warn(rng->dev, "Seed setting not finished\n");
> > > > + ret = -EIO;
> > > > + goto out;
> > > > + }
> > > > +
> > > > + ret = 0;
> > > > + /* Save seed for suspend */
> > > > + memcpy(rng->seed_save, seed, slen);
> > >
> > > Is this really necessary? If you need to save some seed, shouldn't that be
> > > an output of the DRNG and not the real seed?
> >
> > When suspended to RAM device will loose the contents of registers
> > (including SEED registers) so it has to be initialized with something on
> > resume.
> >
> > The seed registers are write-only so I cannot read them and store
> > contents just before suspend.
> >
> > I understand that real seed should not be stored... but then if I am not
> > able to re-seed it with same values, I will loose the continuous and
> > reproducible pseudo-random generation after suspend. Aren't this
> > expected out of PRNG?
>
> An RNG has to be stateless from the perspective of the caller -- this is the
> core implication of entropy.
>
> Then, if you add the initial seed after the RNG lost its state implies that
> the same sequence of random numbers starts again. I.e. where is the
> randomness?
Ahhh, yes, you are right. The device would not continue on its random
generation because all state is lost anyway.
I'll use the generated random numbers.
> > > Besides, how do you know that slen is not larger than
> > > EXYNOS_RNG_SEED_SIZE?
> >
> > Right, there is a overflow here. It should be sizeof(rng->seed_save);
>
> shouldn't it be min(rng->seed_save, slen)?
Now it is irrelevant but anyway I am not allowing the seed to be less
then EXYNOS_RNG_SEED_SIZE (== sizeof(rng->seed_save)). The device
expects all five channels (registers) to be seeded.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
