On Sun, Mar 05, 2017 at 04:08:39PM +0100, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
>
> -> #1 (genl_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2267 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2149/0x3430 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3340
> lock_acquire+0x2a1/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3755
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x172/0x1730 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
> mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
> genl_lock net/netlink/genetlink.c:32 [inline]
> genl_lock_dumpit+0x41/0x90 net/netlink/genetlink.c:478
> netlink_dump+0x54d/0xd40 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2127
> __netlink_dump_start+0x4e5/0x760 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2217
> genl_family_rcv_msg+0xd9d/0x1040 net/netlink/genetlink.c:546
> genl_rcv_msg+0xa6/0x140 net/netlink/genetlink.c:620
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x2ab/0x390 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2298
> genl_rcv+0x28/0x40 net/netlink/genetlink.c:631
> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1231 [inline]
> netlink_unicast+0x514/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1257
> netlink_sendmsg+0xa9f/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1803
> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:633 [inline]
> sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:643
> sock_write_iter+0x326/0x600 net/socket.c:846
> call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1733 [inline]
> new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:497 [inline]
> __vfs_write+0x483/0x740 fs/read_write.c:510
> vfs_write+0x187/0x530 fs/read_write.c:558
> SYSC_write fs/read_write.c:605 [inline]
> SyS_write+0xfb/0x230 fs/read_write.c:597
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
>
> -> #0 (nlk->cb_mutex){+.+.+.}:
> check_prev_add kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1830 [inline]
> check_prevs_add+0xa8f/0x19f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:1940
> validate_chain kernel/locking/lockdep.c:2267 [inline]
> __lock_acquire+0x2149/0x3430 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3340
> lock_acquire+0x2a1/0x630 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3755
> __mutex_lock_common kernel/locking/mutex.c:756 [inline]
> __mutex_lock+0x172/0x1730 kernel/locking/mutex.c:893
> mutex_lock_nested+0x16/0x20 kernel/locking/mutex.c:908
> __netlink_dump_start+0xf4/0x760 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2187
> netlink_dump_start include/linux/netlink.h:165 [inline]
> crypto_user_rcv_msg+0x2ad/0x4f0 crypto/crypto_user.c:517
> netlink_rcv_skb+0x2ab/0x390 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:2298
> crypto_netlink_rcv+0x2a/0x40 crypto/crypto_user.c:538
> netlink_unicast_kernel net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1231 [inline]
> netlink_unicast+0x514/0x730 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1257
> netlink_sendmsg+0xa9f/0xe50 net/netlink/af_netlink.c:1803
> sock_sendmsg_nosec net/socket.c:633 [inline]
> sock_sendmsg+0xca/0x110 net/socket.c:643
> ___sys_sendmsg+0x8fa/0x9f0 net/socket.c:1985
> __sys_sendmsg+0x138/0x300 net/socket.c:2019
> SYSC_sendmsg net/socket.c:2030 [inline]
> SyS_sendmsg+0x2d/0x50 net/socket.c:2026
> entry_SYSCALL_64_fastpath+0x1f/0xc2
This looks like a false positive. The cb_mutex in #1 is not the
same as the cb_mutex in #0. The cb_mutex in #0 comes is obtained
by crypto_user which uses straight netlink. The cb_mutex in #1
is a genl netlink socket.
I'll have a look to see if we can annotate this.
Cheers,
--
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
