On 2 February 2017 at 09:53, Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Feb 02, 2017 at 08:01:47AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> You are right: due to its construction, the CCM mode does not care >> about the incremented counter because it clears the counter part of >> the IV before encrypting the MAC. So this is caused by an optimization >> in my code rather than the CCM code being incorrect. > > OK so you will send me an update for the ARM64 code, right? > Yes, on their way Thanks, Ard.
