On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 12:08:07PM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Linus Torvalds
> <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2017 at 6:02 AM, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >> Just to clarify, I think you're asking if, for versions of gcc which
> >> don't support -mpreferred-stack-boundary=3, objtool can analyze all C
> >> functions to ensure their stacks are 16-byte aligned.
> >>
> >> It's certainly possible, but I don't see how that solves the problem.
> >> The stack will still be misaligned by entry code. Or am I missing
> >> something?
> >
> > I think the argument is that we *could* try to align things, if we
> > just had some tool that actually then verified that we aren't missing
> > anything.
> >
> > I'm not entirely happy with checking the generated code, though,
> > because as Ingo says, you have a 50:50 chance of just getting it right
> > by mistake. So I'd much rather have some static tool that checks
> > things at a code level (ie coccinelle or sparse).
>
> What I meant was checking the entry code to see if it aligns stack
> frames, and good luck getting sparse to do that. Hmm, getting 16-byte
> alignment for real may actually be entirely a lost cause. After all,
> I think we have some inline functions that do asm volatile ("call
> ..."), and I don't see any credible way of forcing alignment short of
> generating an entirely new stack frame and aligning that.
Actually we already found all such cases and fixed them by forcing a new
stack frame, thanks to objtool. For example, see 55a76b59b5fe.
> Ick. This
> whole situation stinks, and I wish that the gcc developers had been
> less daft here in the first place or that we'd noticed and gotten it
> fixed much longer ago.
>
> Can we come up with a macro like STACK_ALIGN_16 that turns into
> __aligned__(32) on bad gcc versions and combine that with your sparse
> patch?
--
Josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
