Re: [RFC PATCH 4.10 1/6] crypto/sha256: Refactor the API so it can be used without shash

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 09:57:53AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> 
> I actually do use incremental hashing later on.   BPF currently
> vmallocs() a big temporary buffer just so it can fill it and hash it.
> I change it to hash as it goes.

How much data is this supposed to hash on average? If it's a large
amount then perhaps using the existing crypto API would be a better
option than adding this.

Cheers,
-- 
Email: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/
PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux