On Fri, 2016-12-16 at 11:47 -0800, Tom Herbert wrote: > > That's about 3x of jhash speed (7 nsecs). So that might closer > to a more palatable replacement for jhash. Do we lose any security > advantages with halfsiphash? Have you tested a lower round SipHash? Probably best to stick with the usual construction for non-DoS mitigation, but why not try SipHash 1-3, 1-2, etc. for DoS mitigation? Rust and Swift both went with SipHash 1-3 for hash tables.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
