On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 09:49:46AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 19 October 2016 at 09:46, Will Deacon <will.deacon@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:03:33AM +0800, Herbert Xu wrote: > >> I was planning merging these for 4.10. But I'm fine with them > >> going through the arm tree. Let me know what you guys want to > >> do. > > > > I assumed you'd take them through crypto, as per usual, so I didn't > > queue anything in the arm64 tree. > > > > Ard -- were you planning to get these in for 4.9? > > > > These are arguably bug fixes, but I spotted them by accident, they > weren't reported to me or anything. But it seems strange to add a cc > stable and then hold off until the next merge window. > > In any case, I don't care deeply either way, as long as they get > merged in the end. I think it makes sense to keep them together (arm64 > + ARM), so Herbert's tree is a more natural route for them to take. I > will leave it up to Herbert whether they are sent onward as fixes or > as part of v4.10 Sounds good to me. Will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
