Hi Herbert, I'm a little bit confused on how echainiv is supposed to work. I think it's doing a few things wrongly, I just can't decide what's actually wrong as the intended mode of operation is unclear to me. At least, as-is, the code isn't quite operating as advertised in the comment at the top of the file. So, in hope you could enlighten me, here's my understanding of the current _implementation_ of echainiv (assuming aligned req->iv, for simplicity): For each request it XORs the salt into the provided IV (req->iv). For ESP the provided IV is the sequence number or, at least, parts of it. The thus modified IV gets written into the *destination* buffer (req->dst) which might be a different buffer than the source buffer (not in the ESP case, though, as it passes the same sg for src and dst). Afterwards, the per-cpu IV gets copied over into req->iv, effectively overwriting the generated XORed value. Then the inner crypto request gets initiated which may finish synchronously or asynchronously. Either way, the per-cpu IV gets updated with the new value from subreq->iv, which should be equal to req->iv in the normal case. Things that are unclear to me: 1/ Why is the XORed IV written to the destination buffer and not the source buffer? Isn't the sub-request supposed to use the IV from either req->src or req->iv -- and especially *not* from req->dst? 2/ Why does the XORed IV gets overwritten with the per-cpu IV prior passing it on to the sub-request, making all possible IV locations in req->src, req->dst and req->iv *all* be different? Moreover, the behaviour of 2/ actually leads to the fact, that the very first IV on each CPU will be a null IV -- not a salted sequence number. All following IVs will be the result of the (or better "some") sub-request's IV update, stored into the per-cpu variable -- still no salted sequence numbers, though. That behaviour is a bug, IMHO, as this clearly differs from what is described in the comment. However, I'm uncertain on how to fix it, as the intended mode of operation is unclear to me... Should only the first IV of each crypto transform be the salted sequence number and all following the result of the sub-request's IV update, therefore not stored in a single per-cpu variable but some echainiv context specific one? 3/ Why is echainiv using per-cpu IVs in the first place? Shouldn't those be crypto context specific? Currently we're happily mixing IVs from different transforms (with possibly different IV sizes!) with each other via the per-cpu variables. That might be an "issue" if one echainiv user can maliciously mess with the IVs of another user, e.g. via AF_ALG. So, should echainiv use a per-context per-cpu array instead that -- for simplicity -- gets initialised with random bytes and will be updated as it's now, just not with a single global per-cpu array, but a per-context one? That would allow us to still have a lock-less IV generator but one that cannot be accidentally / maliciously be tampered with by other echainiv users. Thanks, Mathias -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
