On Wed, Aug 17, 2016 at 11:35 AM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
<prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This patch adds support for hardware random number generator present in
> JZ4780 SoC.
>
> Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan <prasannatsmkumar@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> ...
> +static int jz4780_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *buf, size_t max, bool wait)
> +{
> + struct jz4780_rng *jz4780_rng = container_of(rng, struct jz4780_rng,
> + rng);
> + u32 *data = buf;
> + *data = jz4780_rng_readl(jz4780_rng, REG_RNG_DATA);
> + return 4;
> +}
My bad, I should have spotted this earlier....
i686, x86_64 and some ARM will sometimes define a macro indicating
unaligned data access is allowed. For example, see
__ARM_FEATURE_UNALIGNED (cf.,
http://infocenter.arm.com/help/index.jsp?topic=/com.arm.doc.dui0774f/chr1383660321827.html)
. MIPSEL does not define such a macro.
# MIPS ci20 creator with GCC 4.6
$ gcc -march=native -dM -E - </dev/null | grep -i align
#define __BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__ 8
If the MIPS CPU does not tolerate unaligned data access, then the
following could SIGBUS:
> + u32 *data = buf;
> + *data = jz4780_rng_readl(jz4780_rng, REG_RNG_DATA);
If GCC emits code that uses the MIPS unaligned load and store
instructions, then there's probably going to be a performance penalty.
Regardless of what the CPU tolerates, I believe unaligned data access
is undefined behavior in C/C++. I believe you should memcpy the value
into the buffer.
Jeff
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
