Hi,
While testing AF_ALG with openssl af-alg-rr, I've found that:
OPENSSL_CONF=/shared/crypto/openssl-imx.cnf openssl dgst -sha1 </dev/null
fails with a zero hash result:
socket(PF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0) = 3
close(3) = 0
socket(PF_ALG, SOCK_SEQPACKET, 0) = 3
bind(3, {sa_family=AF_ALG, sa_data="hash\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"}, 88) = 0
accept(3, 0, NULL) = 4
fstat64(0, {st_mode=S_IFCHR|0666, st_rdev=makedev(1, 3), ...}) = 0
ioctl(0, SNDCTL_TMR_TIMEBASE or SNDRV_TIMER_IOCTL_NEXT_DEVICE or TCGETS, 0xbed50d5c) = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for device)
mmap2(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0xb6fe4000
read(0, "", 8192) = 0
read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 20) = 20
close(4) = 0
close(3) = 0
tested with the Freescale CAAM driver with SHA1 and MD5 hashes, and
the ARM SHA1 shash implementation. Should there at least be a single
write to the socket (of zero size) in this case, or should the kernel
return the correct hash on the first read without a preceding
write/send?
I don't think this is a regression afaik - it's been around for some
time (at least from when I first started to poke at the ARM crypto
stuff around v4.2 or v4.3 time.)
Thanks.
--
RMK's Patch system: http://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 9.6Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
