Hi, I'm trying to experimentally implement the GCM-SIV AEAD algorithm from [1] for the Linux crypto API and I've ran into a problem... Basically, the encryption/decryption process starts by deriving a so-called "record-encryption key" from the nonce (by encrypting it using another key) and this key is then used to encrypt the plaintext in CTR mode and to encrypt the final authentication tag (otherwise it works similarly to GCM). Since the API is asynchronous and multiple requests can be executed in parallel over a single cipher handle (according to [2]), I need to have a separate underlying cipher handle for each AEAD request. Now this is a problem, because aead_request has no init/destroy mechanism where I could allocate/free the cipher handle, which means I would have to do this inside the encrypt/decrypt function. AFAIK, allocating with GFP_KERNEL inside encrypt/decrypt functions is problematic, as they may be called from an atomic context. Besides, it seems that also the crypto_*_setkey functions are not guaranteed to be atomic [3], and I will need to call such function either way... OTOH, the CTR mode/AES driver should not really need to allocate any memory there, so this may be tolerable... Does anyone have any ideas how to deal with this? BTW, for justification of deriving the key from the nonce see section 9 of [1]. I don't really like the design decision, but there seems to be no better way to achieve the same property... Thanks, Ondrej Mosnáček [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-irtf-cfrg-gcmsiv-01 [2] https://www.kernel.org/doc/htmldocs/crypto-API/ch05s03.html [3] https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-crypto/msg17733.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
