Re: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - Use different flag vars for nested locks

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/11/2016 10:40 AM, Gary R Hook wrote:
> This patch fixes a coccinelle warning about reusing a flags
> variable in nested lock acquisition.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>

> ---
>  drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
> index 336e5b7..9c7bce8 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
> @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ void ccp_del_device(struct ccp_device *ccp)
>  
>  static struct ccp_device *ccp_get_device(void)
>  {
> -	unsigned long flags;
> +	unsigned long flags, rrflags;
>  	struct ccp_device *dp = NULL;
>  
>  	/* We round-robin through the unit list.
> @@ -128,14 +128,14 @@ static struct ccp_device *ccp_get_device(void)
>  	 */
>  	read_lock_irqsave(&ccp_unit_lock, flags);
>  	if (!list_empty(&ccp_units)) {
> -		write_lock_irqsave(&ccp_rr_lock, flags);
> +		write_lock_irqsave(&ccp_rr_lock, rrflags);
>  		dp = ccp_rr;
>  		if (list_is_last(&ccp_rr->entry, &ccp_units))
>  			ccp_rr = list_first_entry(&ccp_units, struct ccp_device,
>  						  entry);
>  		else
>  			ccp_rr = list_next_entry(ccp_rr, entry);
> -		write_unlock_irqrestore(&ccp_rr_lock, flags);
> +		write_unlock_irqrestore(&ccp_rr_lock, rrflags);
>  	}
>  	read_unlock_irqrestore(&ccp_unit_lock, flags);
>  
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux