Hi David, On 02/11/2016 02:08 AM, David Howells wrote: > David Howells <dhowells@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Tadeusz Struk <tadeusz.struk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > >>>> > > > Why didn't you put the RSA signature parsing - ie. where the OID and the other >>>> > > > bits are checked - into crypto/rsa.c? >>>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > Do you want to get rid of the crypto/asymmetric_keys/rsa.c completely? >>> > > I wanted to make the conversion churn as small as possible. >>> > > I can move it in a subsequent patch if you want. >> > >> > I was thinking of getting rid of it completely, yes. >> > >> > But I was wondering if you had some other motivation, such as keeping the >> > crypto layer purely the mathematical operation. >> > >> > It's an interesting question where to draw the line, actually. The answer may >> > hinge on what things like the TPM do. I should ask the TPM folks. > Looking in the TPM emulator, the TPM_Sign operation indeed puts the wrappings > on, so this needs to go into the crypto layer. David, If you could tell me what repo should I work with then I can prepare subsequent patch to move this to a new file under crypto/ Thanks, -- TS -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
