Re: [PATCH v2 04/10] crypto/compress: add asynchronous compression support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2016-02-04 23:53 GMT+09:00 Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:17:41PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>>
>> Do you think not to merge scomp? Please let me know your overall
>> plan about this.?
>
> I'm fine with a driver-side scomp interface.  But I'd rather
> avoid having yet another user-side compression interface in the
> form of scomp if we can avoid it.

I mentioned that there are usecases that scomp is needed for performance,
it means that we can't avoid it. Or do you think this usecase differently?
I understand it's rather pain that we have two interfaces but scomp interface
is just wrapping layer to handle various S/W compression algorithms and
implementation is not that complex. I guess it doesn't cause much
maintenance cost.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux