Re: [PATCH v3 5/5] crypto: AES CBC multi-buffer glue code

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, 2015-12-01 at 09:19 -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-11-26 at 16:49 +0800, Herbert Xu wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 24, 2015 at 10:30:06AM -0800, Tim Chen wrote:
> > >
> > > On the decrypt path, we don't need to use multi-buffer algorithm
> > > as aes-cbc decrypt can be parallelized inherently on a single
> > > request.  So most of the time the outer layer algorithm
> > > cbc_mb_async_ablk_decrypt can bypass mcryptd and
> > > invoke mb_aes_cbc_decrypt synchronously
> > > to do aes_cbc_dec when fpu is available.
> > > This avoids the overhead of going through mcryptd.  Hence
> > > the use of blkcipher on the inner layer.  For the mcryptd
> > > path, we will complete a decrypt request in one shot so
> > > blkcipher usage should be fine.
> > 
> > I think there is a misunderstanding here.  Just because you're
> > using/exporting through the ablkcipher interface doesn't mean
> > that you are asynchrounous.  For example, all blkcipher algorithms
> > can be accessed through the ablkcipher interface and they of course
> > remain synchrounous.
> > 
> > So I don't see how using an ablkcipher in the inner layer changes
> > anything at all.  You can still return immediately and not bother
> > with completion functions when you are synchrounous.
> > 
> > Cheers,
> 
> OK, I'll try to see if I can cast things back to the original ablkcipher
> request and use that to walk the sg list.
> 

Herbert,

I've sent out a new version of this series to use ablkcipher on the
inner layer of decrypt.  Thanks.

Tim

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux