Nick Kossifidis <mickflemm@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > That was partially my intention too when I submitted > 2aa56cca3571fd08c0c38f3e2d4bb0bfb3def3c5 which mixes FFT measurements > to the entropy pool without providing any estimation on entropy > (entropy estimation is the wrong approach, read the papers on fortuna > for more information on that). I believe that this approach is better > than mine because FFT data is too much (high throughput) and may have > a negative impact on the pool when mixed like this (even without the > entropy count) so Kale please revert my patch also (I was about to > submit a request for reverting it and writing something similar when > this thread came up). Could you submit the revert as a patch and with the explonation in the commit log, please? -- Kalle Valo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
