Re: [PATCH 17/18] crypto: marvell: fix first-fragment handling in mv_cesa_ahash_dma_last_req()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russell,

Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> When adding the software padding, this must be done using the first/mid
> fragment mode, and any subsequent operation needs to be a mid-fragment.
> Fix this.
>
> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c | 8 --------
>  1 file changed, 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> index da541e59cc1d..34271e9eb3a5 100644
> --- a/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> +++ b/drivers/crypto/marvell/hash.c
> @@ -575,20 +575,12 @@ mv_cesa_ahash_dma_last_req(struct mv_cesa_tdma_chain *chain,
>  		if (IS_ERR(op))
>  			return op;
>  
> -		mv_cesa_update_op_cfg(op, CESA_SA_DESC_CFG_MID_FRAG,
> -				      CESA_SA_DESC_CFG_FRAG_MSK);
> -
>  		if (len == trailerlen)
>  			return op;
>  
>  		padoff += len;
>  	}
>  
> -	if (!mv_cesa_mac_op_is_first_frag(&creq->op_tmpl))
> -		mv_cesa_update_op_cfg(&creq->op_tmpl,
> -				      CESA_SA_DESC_CFG_MID_FRAG,
> -				      CESA_SA_DESC_CFG_FRAG_MSK);
> -
>  	ret = mv_cesa_dma_add_data_transfer(chain,
>  					    CESA_SA_DATA_SRAM_OFFSET,
>  					    ahashdreq->padding_dma +

I'll consider it's just late here and I need some sleep but I fail to
align the commit message w/ the content of the patch, i.e. it's
unclear to me.

Cheers,

a+
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux