Re: [PATCH v2 5/7] hwrng: st: Add support for ST's HW Random Number Generator

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Lee

Late but...

On 17/09/15 14:45, Lee Jones wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile b/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
index 055bb01..8bcfb45 100644
--- a/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/Makefile
@@ -30,4 +30,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_TPM) += tpm-rng.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_BCM2835) += bcm2835-rng.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_IPROC_RNG200) += iproc-rng200.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_MSM) += msm-rng.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_ST) += st-rng.o
  obj-$(CONFIG_HW_RANDOM_XGENE) += xgene-rng.o
diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/st-rng.c b/drivers/char/hw_random/st-rng.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..8c8a435
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/st-rng.c
@@ -0,0 +1,144 @@
+/*
+ * ST Random Number Generator Driver ST's Platforms
+ *
+ * Author: Pankaj Dev: <pankaj.dev@xxxxxx>
+ *         Lee Jones <lee.jones@xxxxxxxxxx>
+ *
+ * Copyright (C) 2015 STMicroelectronics (R&D) Limited
+ *
+ * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
+ * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
+ * published by the Free Software Foundation.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/clk.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/hw_random.h>
+#include <linux/io.h>
+#include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
+#include <linux/platform_device.h>
+#include <linux/slab.h>
+
+/* Registers */
+#define ST_RNG_STATUS_REG		0x20
+#define ST_RNG_DATA_REG			0x24
+
+/* Registers fields */
+#define ST_RNG_STATUS_BAD_SEQUENCE	BIT(0)
+#define ST_RNG_STATUS_BAD_ALTERNANCE	BIT(1)
+#define ST_RNG_STATUS_FIFO_FULL		BIT(5)
+
+#define ST_RNG_FIFO_SIZE		8
+#define ST_RNG_SAMPLE_SIZE		2 /* 2 Byte (16bit) samples */
+
+/* Samples are available every 0.667us, which we round to 1us */
+#define ST_RNG_FILL_FIFO_TIMEOUT   (1 * (ST_RNG_FIFO_SIZE / ST_RNG_SAMPLE_SIZE))
+
+struct st_rng_data {
+	void __iomem	*base;
+	struct clk	*clk;
+	struct hwrng	ops;
+};
+
+static int st_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void *data, size_t max, bool wait)
+{
+	struct st_rng_data *ddata = (struct st_rng_data *)rng->priv;
+	u32 status;
+	int i;
+
+	if (max < sizeof(u16))
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/* Wait until FIFO is full - max 4uS*/
+	for (i = 0; i < ST_RNG_FILL_FIFO_TIMEOUT; i++) {
+		status = readl_relaxed(ddata->base + ST_RNG_STATUS_REG);
+		if (status & ST_RNG_STATUS_FIFO_FULL)
+			break;
+		udelay(1);

How much bandwidth does using udelay() cost? I think it could be >10% compared to a tighter polling loop.


+	}
+
+	if (i == ST_RNG_FILL_FIFO_TIMEOUT)
+		return 0;

Isn't a timeout an error condition?


+
+	for (i = 0; i < ST_RNG_FIFO_SIZE && i < max; i += 2)
+		*(u16 *)(data + i) =
+			readl_relaxed(ddata->base + ST_RNG_DATA_REG);
+
+	return i;	/* No of bytes read */
+}
+
+static int st_rng_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct st_rng_data *ddata;
+	struct resource *res;
+	struct clk *clk;
+	void __iomem *base;
+	int ret;
+
+	ddata = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(*ddata), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ddata)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
+	base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, res);
+	if (IS_ERR(base))
+		return PTR_ERR(base);
+
+	clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+	if (IS_ERR(clk))
+		return PTR_ERR(clk);
+
+	ret = clk_prepare_enable(clk);
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	ddata->ops.priv	= (unsigned long)ddata;
+	ddata->ops.read	= st_rng_read;
+	ddata->ops.name	= pdev->name;
+	ddata->base	= base;
+	ddata->clk	= clk;
+
+	dev_set_drvdata(&pdev->dev, ddata);
+
+	ret = hwrng_register(&ddata->ops);
+	if (ret) {
+		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Failed to register HW RNG\n");

Why shout about this particular error but not any others? Perhaps just rely on the driver core to report the error here?


+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	dev_info(&pdev->dev, "Successfully registered HW RNG\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static int st_rng_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
+{
+	struct st_rng_data *ddata = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
+
+	hwrng_unregister(&ddata->ops);
+
+	clk_disable_unprepare(ddata->clk);

This mismatches the error paths in the probe function (there is no cleanup of clock counts in probe function).


Daniel.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-crypto" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Kernel]     [Gnu Classpath]     [Gnu Crypto]     [DM Crypt]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]

  Powered by Linux